Persson v. Faestel Investments, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

As part of this Court’s memorandum opinion and order (the “Opinion”) dated September 23, 1980, this Court concluded that with a narrow exception1 plaintiffs' opposition to defendants’ Motion To Compel Discovery was not substantially justified. It apportioned the expenses in what it found to be a just manner, as contemplated by the last sentence of Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 37(a)(4), and ordered plaintiffs to pay defendants eighty percent of their reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees and other costs, incurred in relation to the motion.…