Legal Opinion
Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 22, 1985No. Civ. A. No. B-82-56 (RCZ)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
ZAMPANO, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Remington Products, Inc. (“Remington”) brought this antitrust action to challenge the acquisition of the “Schick” trademark by a competitor, defendant North American Philips Corporation. Pending is Remington’s motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37. The motion is based on the failure of defendant N.V. Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken (“N.V. Philips”) to provide any discovery from the date that the complaint was filed, January 18, 1982, through December 13, 1984. For the following reasons, the motion for sanctions is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- John W. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New York Corporation and Volkswagenwerk, A. G., a Foreign Corporation, Wolfsburg, Western GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Roy Anderson Day v. Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Enterprises Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation M.D.L. No. 1775District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.