Legal Opinion

People v. Osorio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to meet his burden of showing the material and relevant nature of the informant’s testimony necessary to require pretrial disclosure of the informant’s identity (see, e.g., People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, cert denied 419 US 1012; People v Nicholaysen, 122 AD2d 170). At trial, the People voluntarily disclosed the informant’s identity, but informed the court that they were unaware of his present whereabouts. The record supports the determination that the People had not contributed in any way to the disappearance of the informant and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. ManeiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. Lee, New York County Courts1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API