People v. Maneiro
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The trial court made a specific factual determination that the People had not contributed in any way to the disappearance of the informant and further found that the People had acted with reasonable diligence in attempting to locate the informant when it became apparent that his testimony might be relevant to defendant’s case. Inasmuch as these findings, which were affirmed by the Appellate Division, were based upon sufficient evidence and were not otherwise infected by error of law, they must be treated as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. BuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. PeltakNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. MalikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. McKinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.