Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. United Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 7, 2008No. D051011PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
In this insurance coverage action, plaintiff and respondent Royal Indemnity Company (Royal) sued its former insured, defendant and respondent United Enterprises, Inc., 1 for declaratory relief to establish that Royal should not be obligated to provide liability insurance coverage under its 1960’s-era policy purchased by United for its business that was operated on certain real property that United formerly owned (the subject property). During that period of time, United owned a trap and skeet shooting range located on the subject property, and environmental contaminants…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Treesdale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Haynes v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Teague v. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Western Heritage Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Otay Land Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bleavins v. DemarestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- D. Cummins Corp. v. U.S. Fid. & Guaranty Co., California Court of Appeal, 1st District2016
- Ahn v. Hestrin CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.