Lehmann v. Washington National Insurance
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOLLOY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The parties have asked through cross motions for summary judgment for a determination of whether Margaret Lehmann is entitled to benefits that were excluded by way of an “Exception Endorsement” to a Medical Insurance policy she and her husband purchased in 1993. When the policy was issued, Montana law prohibited excluding pre-existing medical conditions for a period in excess of 12 months. Mont.Code Ann. § 33-22-110 (1993). More than a year after the policy in question had been in effect, the Montana Legislature enacted Mont.Code Ann. § 33-22-109…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. HubbardMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Gulbrandson v. CareyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Vaughn & Ragsdale Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re SiegleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2001
- Molnar v. Conseco Medical InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Molnar v. Conseco Medical Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005