Legal Opinion

Lehmann v. Washington National Insurance

District Court, D. Montana

Decided October 28, 1997No. CV 97-10-BU-DWMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOLLOY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The parties have asked through cross motions for summary judgment for a determination of whether Margaret Lehmann is entitled to benefits that were excluded by way of an “Exception Endorsement” to a Medical Insurance policy she and her husband purchased in 1993. When the policy was issued, Montana law prohibited excluding pre-existing medical conditions for a period in excess of 12 months. Mont.Code Ann. § 33-22-110 (1993). More than a year after the policy in question had been in effect, the Montana Legislature enacted Mont.Code Ann. § 33-22-109…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. HubbardMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Gulbrandson v. CareyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Vaughn & Ragsdale Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re SiegleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2001
  2. Molnar v. Conseco Medical InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Molnar v. Conseco Medical Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API