Legal Opinion
Molnar v. Conseco Medical Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 9, 2005No. 1-04-0821PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn
In both 1981 and 1995, David Molnar had surgery to implant and replace an artificial left hip, necessitated by a childhood injury and severe arthritis. In May 2000, after his original insurer had gone out of business, Molnar purchased a health insurance policy from Conseco Medical Insurance Company (Conseco) that included the following “Exception Endorsement”:
“NO BENEFITS WILL BE PAID UNDER THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE, OR UNDER ANY RIDER OR AMENDMENT THERETO, FOR DISABILITY, LOSS OR EXPENSE RESULTING FROM OR CAUSED BY ANY DISEASE OR DISORDER OF THE LEFT HIP INCLUDING ANY OPERATION OR…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Travelers Insurance v. Eljer Manufacturing, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Hobbs v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the MidwestIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Menke v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Usick v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006