Bock v. Truck & Tractor, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
This was an action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries. The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, con-cededly upon the ground that the pleading did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiffs declined to plead further, and the court thereupon entered judgment dismissing the action. From that judgment, plaintiffs appealed.
Since the demurrer admits the truth of all allegations of fact well pleaded in the complaint, such allegations must now be considered as constituting the sole and actual facts in this case. We shall set forth…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Palmer v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Driekosen v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.