Schunk v. Wieland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Plaintiff, who built and sold a new dwelling house to defendants in July 1962, brought suit in December 1966 for $155 claimed due for labor and materials not included in the purchase price. Defendants, by answer, alleged that such labor and materials were furnished as part of the purchase agreement and counterclaimed for $5,779 damages claimed to have been sustained subsequent to their purchase because of wet-basement problems caused by the seepage of water…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Hafner v. RitzingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Daigle v. Twin City Ready Mix Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BastingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Holkestad v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Duchene v. WolstanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Erickson v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Holkestad v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970