Holkestad v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
This appeal arises out of plaintiffs’ action for personal-injury damage resulting from an exploding 16-ounce bottle of carbonated beverage. The jury awarded $1,500 damages to plaintiff *250Eileen Holkestad, the injured party, ¿nd $500 to plaintiff Willard Holkestad, her husband, against defendant Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Minnesota, Inc. Defendant bottling company appeals from the judgment and the trial court’s denial of its post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The dispositive question presented is whether the circumstantial evidence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Willmar, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Kerr v. Corning Glass WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Giant Food, Inc. v. Washington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Bredberg v. Pepsico, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Raymond W. Daleiden v. The Carborundum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.