Legal Opinion

Holkestad v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 1970No. 41765PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

This appeal arises out of plaintiffs’ action for personal-injury damage resulting from an exploding 16-ounce bottle of carbonated beverage. The jury awarded $1,500 damages to plaintiff *250Eileen Holkestad, the injured party, ¿nd $500 to plaintiff Willard Holkestad, her husband, against defendant Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Minnesota, Inc. Defendant bottling company appeals from the judgment and the trial court’s denial of its post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The dispositive question presented is whether the circumstantial evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Willmar, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Kerr v. Corning Glass WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Giant Food, Inc. v. Washington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Bredberg v. Pepsico, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Raymond W. Daleiden v. The Carborundum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API