Legal Opinion

In Re Escoffery

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

Tbis was a proceeding prosecuted by Tbe North Carolina State Bar against Pbillip A. Eseoffery, a practicing attorney of North Carolina, for tbe disbarment of tbe said respondent, under chapter 210, Public Laws 1933, secs. 11, et seq., and acts amendatory thereof. N. C. Code of 1935 (Michie), secs. 215 (11) et seq.

Tbe respondent was duly furnished with a statement of tbe charges against him to which statement he filed answer, and the cause came on to be heard by a trial committee, which committee heard the evidence, found the facts and concluded as a matter of law that the respondent was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Redmond v. . SteppSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Hardison v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Evans v. Imperial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Query v. Gate City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Lea v. . BridgemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Swink v. . HornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. North Carolina State Bar v. TalfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API