Swink v. . Horn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
It was admitted that the plaintiff’s apartment house from which she sought by this proceeding to evict the defendant was located within an area subject to Federal Rent Control. Hence it was necessary for the plaintiff to show not'only the relationship of landlord and tenant, expiration of term and notice to quit, in order to secure possession, but also to show compliance with the regulations promulgated pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended 30 June, 1945 (50 U. S. C. A., Appendix 902). It was said in McGuinn v. McLain, 225 N. C., 750, 36 S. E. (2d), 377, “So long as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- St. George v. HansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Roach v. . PritchettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Turnage Co. v. MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.