Legal Opinion

Shaker, Admx. v. Shaker

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 23, 1943No. File 60234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

There are two sets of costs involved in this appeal, the first being that of the Supreme Court of Errors, the other, that of the Superior Court. Of the former, only this need be said: an appeal from the taxation of costs'in that court does not run to the Superior Court for reasons which are obvious. The proper course is discussed by the Chief Justice in section 184 of his work on appellate procedure. See, also, Beach vs. Travelers Insurance Co., 73 Conn. 475. Hence, the appeal from the taxation of Supreme Court costs is dismissed.

An appeal to the Superior Court is proper, however, whenever- a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erickson v. FooteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Beach v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Triangle Contractors, Inc. v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. Birmingham v. KielczewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Ferranti v. Commissioner of Transportation, No. 359429 (Oct. 11, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API