Stockly v. Doil
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Aynne M. Doil appeals and A. Holmes and Doris Stockly cross-appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Humphrey, C.J.) finding Doil liable pursuant to both 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 75521 and 7552-A2 (2003). Doil asserts that the court erred by finding her liable pursuant to both statutes and by awarding attorney fees to the Stocklys. The Stocklys argue that the court erred by: (1) determining that the stumpage value of the lost trees was the proper measure of damages pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 7552-A; and (2) reducing Doil’s responsibility for damages pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Musk v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- S.D. Warren Co. v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Bonk v. McPhersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Dexter v. Town of NorwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Eaton v. European & North American Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wawenock, LLC v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Dionne v. LeClercSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Doucette v. Hallsmith/Sysco Food Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- In re Dustin C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Marina Narowetz v. Board of Dental PracticeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.