Legal Opinion

Pacific Decision Sciences Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 2004No. G033648PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Petitioner Pacific Decision Sciences Corporation (defendant) seeks a writ of mandate compelling the trial court to vacate its February 17, 2004 order (the February 17 order) which requires defendant to deliver to the Orange County Sheriff “all funds existing at the time of service of this Order in any and all of its deposit accounts at Fidelity Federal Bank & Trust at 412 Lucerne Avenue, Lake Worth, Florida ... or at any other location or branch of said bank existing outside of California.” The February 17 order also requires defendant, “regardless of whether the payment is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Thayer Plymouth Center, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Estate of WaitsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aequitas Enters., LLC v. Interstate Investment Group, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. PALACIO DEL MAR HOMEOWNERS ASSN., INC. v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Vfs Financing, Inc. v. Chf Express, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  4. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. Metric & Inch Tools, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  5. Tonzip Maritime Ltd. v. Coral Energy Pte. Ltd.District Court, E.D. California · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API