Butler ex rel. Jones v. Lupton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Since this case comes here upon the propriety of a judgment as of nonsuit, we have not thought it necessary to extend the record by recounting defendant’s evidence, although the latter is not free from inferences favorable to the plaintiff. Ford v. R. R., 209 N. C., 108, 182 S. E., 717; Davidson v. Telegraph Co., 207 N. C., 790, 178 S. E., 603. It is a familiar rule that we must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Mulford v. Hotel Co., 213 N. C., 603, 197 S. E., 169; Gunn v. Taxi Co., 212 N. C., 540, 193 S. E., 747; Matthews v. Cheatham, 210 N. C., 592, 188 S.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Pendergraft v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Mulford v. Cotton States Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Matthews v. . CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.