Legal Opinion

Peters v. Cooper

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1956No. 4300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOTTINGER, Judge. ■

Plaintiffs-have appealed-from an adverse judgment. In our opinion the trial judge has' adequately resolved the issue presented in this matter in his written reasons for judgment and-we therefore adopt same as our own. They are as follows: . .

“This is a suit by two '(resident) taxpayers seeking to recover from the Collector of Revenue of the State of Louisiana' certain sums paid to the Collector 'under protest in settlement of income tax deficiencies assessed against them for the years 1946 and-1947. The matter.is submitted to the Court on an agreed statement of faqts, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Bullen v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Frick Et Al. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Bullen v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Dyke v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sugar v. State ex rel. Collector of RevenueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Sandoz v. Louisiana, Department of Revenue & Taxation (In re Oilfield Instruments)District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1985
  3. L. L. Sugar v. State ex rel. Collector of RevenueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. McNamara v. Leslie Ardoin, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API