Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Stokes v. Probate Court of Cuyahoga County
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 1969No. 29505PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is before us as an action originating in this court for a writ of prohibition.
In accordance with the provisions of Sections 733.72 to 733.77, inclusive, Eevised Code, a complaint, bearing the signatures of five electors of the city of Cleveland, was filed in the Probate Court of Cuyahoga County. The complaint makes certain allegations against the Honorable Carl B. Stokes, Mayor of the city of Cleveland, and seeks to have the Probate Court remove Mr. Stokes from his office, and alleges that he has been guilty of misfeasance and malfeasance in office.
Defendant Stokes filed a motion to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Henry v. Central National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Acme Engineering Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Elliott Co. v. ConnarOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. StromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Urseth v. City of DaytonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. StromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.