Legal Opinion
Daniels v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1331PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Lashan Daniels (“Daniels”) and her minor son (“M.C.”) bring this action against Defendants the District of Columbia and District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Officers Napper, Alvarenga, and Salice in connection with the arrest of Daniels and the detention of M.C. Defendants have moved for partial dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
On May 18,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Daniels v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jackson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bonner v. S-Fer International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Flythe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Uzoukwu v. Metropolitan Washington Council of GovernmentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.