Legal Opinion

People v. Milligan

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1926No. Docket No. 1326PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime inhibited by section 476 of the Penal Code, which makes punishable the fraudulent act of making, passing, uttering, or publishing a fictitious bill, note, or check.

More particularly the information herein charged in substance that at a designated time and place defendant did wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously utter, publish, and have in his possession a certain false and fictitious promissory note which he attempted to pass as true and genuine.

The first point urged by appellant as a reason for reversal of the judgment is that,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. WebberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. People v. RippeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. People v. ShopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. People v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API