Legal Opinion
People v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1917No. Crim. No. 688PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
It is only necessary to say in this case that the original information purported to charge a public offense, and that the amended information as filed, after the request of the district attorney and upon the permission of the court being given, did not charge an offense different from that attempted to be stated in the original information. Consequently the filing of the amended complaint neither prejudiced the defendant nor contravened the provisions of section 1008 of the Penal Code. (See People v. Rippe, 32 Cal. App. 514, [163 Pac. 506].)
The record does not sustain the contention…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. RippeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. O'MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. MilliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. LibertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.