Legal Opinion

People v. Hernandez

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1961No. Crim. 7322PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appellant Hernandez and one William Juan Espinosa were charged in an amended information with violation of section 11501, Health and Safety Code, in that they did on January 26, 1960, “offer to sell, furnish and give away a narcotic, to wit, heroin. ’ ’ Espinosa entered a plea of guilty at the beginning of the trial in the superior court and as a witness attempted to exonerate Hernandez, testifying that he himself had agreed to sell State Narcotics Agent Pulliam some narcotics and that he was arrested while counting the money Pulliam had paid him for the same; that Hernandez had nothing to do…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. CombesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. WallinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re RanerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. McQuistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API