City of Petaluma v. Cohen
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION†]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUARTE, J.
A few months before the 2011 enactment of legislation leading to the “Great Dissolution” of California’s redevelopment agencies, 1 the Petaluma Community Development Commission issued bonds to fund certain projects. The commission was the redevelopment agency (Agency) for the City of Petaluma (City), and the newly funded projects included an interchange and roadway undercrossing-of U.S. Highway 101 (the Rainier Project).
The City, as successor to the Agency, submitted various recognized obligation payment schedules (ROPS) that included expenditures of bond proceeds for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Galt v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Global Fin. Distribs. v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Yeager v. Holt, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- City of Anaheim v. BoslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.