Legal Opinion
Yeager v. Holt
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided May 16, 2018No. C079897PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuarte, J.
*452Defendants Peter Holt, Holt Law Firm, and Bethany Holt (collectively Holt, except as noted) appeal from an order denying their special motion to strike (also known as an anti-SLAPP-Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation-motion).1 Peter Holt and his law firm briefly represented Charles E. and Victoria Yeager (collectively Yeager, except as noted)
*453and successfully sued Victoria Yeager to obtain his fees in an action known as Holt v. Yeager (Super. Ct. Nevada County, No. L76533).2 Yeager then sued Holt, alleging professional negligence, misappropriation of name, and other claims. Holt…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Church of Scientology v. WollersheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alan C. Cartwright v. Thomason Hendrix, P.C.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024
- Yeager v. Holt CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021