Chevra Bnai Israel Aushe Yanove und Motal v. Chevra Bikur Cholim Aushe Rodof Sholem
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment' of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, fourth district, rendered in each of these actions, in favor of the defendant, by the justice thereof, without a jury. The opinion states the nature of the action and the material facts.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
These actions were tried together and the ap- ' peals therein were heard at the same time. One was brought to recover the possession of certain chattels, and the other the sum of $55,. delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, under the circumstances hereafter mentioned.
The plaintiff was organized under 2 R. L. 1813, chapter 60, entitled “ An act to provide for the incorporation of religious societies,” and the several acts amendatory thereof, which have been superseded by the Religious Corporations Law. Chap. 42 of- the General Laws, 2 R. S. (Banks & Bros.’ 9th ed.), pp. 1394-1432. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- State ex rel. Brown v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- New-York & Sharon Canal Co., & Sharon Canal Co. v. Fulton BankNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- MacLaury v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Erste Sokolower Congregation Anshe Yosher v. First United Royatiner Sokolower VereinNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Selkir v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1906
- Agoodash Achim of Ithaca, N. Y., Inc. v. Temple Beth-El, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1933