Montgomery v. Sparks
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
The appellant does not question the fact that this proceeding was instituted under the authority of the Attorney General, but does question the authority of the Attorney General, in the absence of specific directions from the Governor under sections 5644 and 5647 of the Code of 1923. True, these sections authorize the Governor to cause suits to be brought for the recovery of public funds, but section 854 of the Code of 1923 authorizes the Attorney General to institute and prosecute all suits in law or equity necessary for the protection of the rights and interest of the state. There is no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Independent District v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Myers v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Wolffe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- State v. BruceIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- National Surety Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carmichael v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Try-Me Bottling Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Graddick, Attorney General of Alabama v. Newman Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Limestone County v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.