Legal Opinion

Willett v. Davis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1948No. 30462PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Arthur H. Davis and Edith E. Davis, his wife, hereinafter referred to as the owners, had a store building to which they desired to construct an addition sixty feet by twenty-five feet in size and to install cold storage lockers therein. H. F. Willett and J. T. Babst, doing business under the trade name of Willett & Sons, hereinafter referred to as the contractors, agreed to do the work. The construction and installation of the cold storage lockers was to cost $4,250 on the basis of a lump-sum contract, and the cost of the addition to the building was to be on the basis of the cost of labor…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Powell v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Orin Osborn v. Boeing Airplane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Mathis v. Thunderbird Village, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. American Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Pacific Industries, Inc. v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API