Legal Opinion
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 22, 1996No. Civil Action 95 Civ. 3474 (CBM), 94 Civ. 8634, 95 Civ. 0110 and 96 Civ. 1755PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Upon consent of the parties, the accompanying Opinion and Order shall be filed as the public version of the Opinion and Order originally filed under seal on June 27, 1996, which granted Genentech, Inc.’s motion for a preliminary injunction in the above-captioned case.
SO ORDERED.
OPINION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I. PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
1. This consolidated action began on November 30, 1994. On May 12, 1995, Genentech Inc. (“Genentech”) moved for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to enjoin Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk of North…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- MediaCom Corp. v. Rates Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- MicroAire Surgical Instruments, LLC v. Arthrex, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
- Data Race, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.