Legal Opinion
Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 6, 1997No. CIV. 96-04047(HAA)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARLOLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction in its patent infringement action. 1 For the reasons detailed below, plaintiffs motion is DENIED.
I. Background
This patent litigation arises from two company’s endeavors to develop a vaccine for a disease known as Porcine Reproductive Respiratory Syndrome (“PRRS”)—“the most challenging infectious disease facing the [swine] industry today.” Hays Declaration ¶ 6, Ex. 5 (copy of Schering letter to Swine Industry Professionals from Robert J. Young, Product Director, Large…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Gallant v. Telebrands Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- CIVIX-DDI, LLC v. Cellco PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- STX, Inc. v. Brine, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.