Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. Caduc
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract upon án account annexed. The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and, after judgment for the plaintiff, to this court, on appeal, upon agreed facts, the material parts of which appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.
It is admitted that the defendant, being the treasurer of the plaintiff corporation and also of the National Color Printing Company, misappropriated the funds of the plaintiff, and, without authority, lent them to the last-named company. The plaintiff afterwards sued the National Color Printing Company; and the defendant contends that this was a ratification of his acts, and discharged him from responsibility. The form of the suit is not stated, except that it was an action of contract. It may have been an action for money had and received, in which the plaintiff went upon the ground that the *86…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Westervelt v. MohrenstecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Rankin v. TygardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Miller v. HydeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- First State Bank v. LangMontana Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.