Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hyde

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 19, 1894PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Replevin of a horse. Writ dated August 10, 1892. The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and, after judgment for the defendant, to this court, on appeal, on agreed facts, in substance as follows. The horse in question was purchased in July, 1890, by Herbert W. Miller, a resident of Boston, through his agent, George Bryden, of Hartford, in the State of Connecticut, who thereafter kept it for him in Hartford.

Read the full summary

Replevin of a horse. Writ dated August 10, 1892. The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and, after judgment for the defendant, to this court, on appeal, on agreed facts, in substance as follows. The horse in question was purchased in July, 1890, by Herbert W. Miller, a resident of Boston, through his agent, George Bryden, of Hartford, in the State of Connecticut, who thereafter kept it for him in Hartford. Miller died in September, 1890, and in- the following November the plaintiff, who was his widow, having been appointed administratrix of his estate, demanded the horse of Bryden, who…

1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.

The plaintiff may maintain replevin if she is the owner of the horse, and if she is not estopped from asserting her ownership against the defendant. As administratrix of her husband’s estate, she was the owner when she brought trover in Connecticut against Bryden, the bailee, who had wrongfully-usurped dominion, and sold and delivered the horse to Davenport. As the horse was in Connecticut and the action of trover was in the courts of that State, the effect of the suit upon her title would be determined by the law of the forum. But as the law of Connecticut is not stated as an agreed fact, we…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Connihan v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Bailey v. HerveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Washburn v. Great Western InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Frost v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Lawyers Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Paramount Laundries Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Rogers v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API