Legal Opinion
Moorhead v. Grassle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 26, 1958No. 37,459PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Commission reversing a decision of the referee and holding that the relators are liable for compensation to the respondent under the provisions of M. S. A. 176.215, subd. 1.
From the record it appears that one of the relators, the Carlton Hotel of Rochester, Minnesota, is a copartnership consisting of Laura Grassle, Carlton Grassle, and Paul Grassle. The relator Paul Grassle was also part owner of property adjoining the Carlton Hotel on which were situated two old buildings. These buildings had been condemned as fire hazards, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Herron v. Coolsaet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Lemkuhl v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Bolin v. ScheurerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Bright v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Christopherson v. Security State Bank of OkleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Executive House Building, Inc. v. DemarestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.