Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Phare

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1961No. 35648PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injury allegedly suffered by plaintiff as the result of a ride on an amusement device known as “Shoot the Chute,” owned and operated by defendants at Playland in Seattle.

The jury returned a verdict for defendants, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

The “Shoot the Chute” is a slide, approximately sixty-five feet high. A boat, in which passengers ride, is pulled up one side of a ramp by a chain, and, after going around a curve at the top of the ramp, slides down a two-hundred-thirty-five-foot chute. It leaves the chute about six inches above the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Rathke v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ulve v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Leavitt v. De YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Rutherford v. DeurWashington Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Albin v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Coffman v. McFaddenWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Peacock v. PiperWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Petersavage v. BockWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Blodgett v. Olympic Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API