Legal Opinion
Rathke v. Roberts
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1949No. 30709PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. In March, 1947, the plaintiff, Rathke, a sole trader doing business as Rathke and Company, was engaged in the business of furnishing refrigeration equipment. The defendants, A. W. Roberts and Chrystal Roberts, his wife, were engaged in the fruit business under the name of A. W. Roberts Fruit Company.
In order to develop the questions raised on appeal, it seems necessary to state the substance of the pleadings. It is alleged in the complaint that, on the sixth day of March, 1947, the plaintiff and the defendant A. W.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wicker v. HoppockSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Skagit Railway & Lumber Co. v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Curtis v. InneraritySupreme Court of the United States · 1848
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Diedrick v. School District No. 81Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Hein v. Chrysler Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- DC Farms, LLC v. Conagra Foods Lamb Weston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. PLATEAU 44Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. Plateau 44 II, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.