Dalpez v. Nix
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young
The plaintiffs in error were respondents below and will be herein referred to as respondents, or separately as Dalpez and the water company. The defendant in error, J. W. Nix, was the petitioner and will be herein so designated, or as Nix.
This action was brought by the petitioner to secure an adjudication of his right to the use of water for irrigation which he alleged was developed from seepage and springs on lands to which reference will herein be made as the Dunham lands. The proceeding is brought under chapter 112 of the Session Laws of Colorado, 1905, being section 1766, O. L. 1921.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Platte Valley Irrigation Co. v. Buckers Irrigation, Milling & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Farmers' Union Ditch Co. v. Rio Grande Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Ripley v. Park Center Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Comrie v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Shelton Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- R.J.A., Inc. v. Water Users Ass'n of District No. 6Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Sweetwater Development Corp. v. RanchesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.