Legal Opinion

R.J.A., Inc. v. Water Users Ass'n of District No. 6

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 10, 1984No. 83SA25PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

R.J.A., Inc. (applicant) appeals from a judgment of the water judge for water division 1 denying its application for a de veloped water right. 1 The applicant based its claim on a project that will reduce water loss from a marshy mountain meadow by removing the underlying peat moss, thereby eliminating a saturated, seepy condition. This will decrease evaporation from the soil and surface and reduce evapotranspiration from grassy vegetation. We affirm the judgment.

R.J.A., Inc. operates a summer resort business on property located south of Estes Park, Colorado, in a mountain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fellhauer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. Platte Valley Irrigation Co. v. Buckers Irrigation, Milling & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. State Engineer v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. City of Aurora v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Three Bells Ranch Associates v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API