R.J.A., Inc. v. Water Users Ass'n of District No. 6
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
LOHR, Justice.
R.J.A., Inc. (applicant) appeals from a judgment of the water judge for water division 1 denying its application for a de veloped water right. 1 The applicant based its claim on a project that will reduce water loss from a marshy mountain meadow by removing the underlying peat moss, thereby eliminating a saturated, seepy condition. This will decrease evaporation from the soil and surface and reduce evapotranspiration from grassy vegetation. We affirm the judgment.
R.J.A., Inc. operates a summer resort business on property located south of Estes Park, Colorado, in a mountain…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fellhauer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Platte Valley Irrigation Co. v. Buckers Irrigation, Milling & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- State Engineer v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- City of Aurora v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Three Bells Ranch Associates v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.