Legal Opinion

Douglas-Hanson Co., Inc. v. BF Goodrich Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 29, 1999No. 98-1737PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, P.J.

BF Goodrich Company appeals a judgment awarding Douglas-Hanson Company, Inc. $1,832,134 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000 in punitive damages. Douglas-Hanson claims it is entitled to tort damages as a result of Goodrich's intentional misrepresentation that it had a commercially viable adhesive product that it was able to deliver to Douglas-Hanson for processing. Goodrich contends that the trial court erroneously denied Goodrich's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) because the economic loss doctrine precludes Douglas-Hanson's pursuit of a tort remedy. Goodrich argues…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas CostarricensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Sunnyslope Grading, Inc. v. Miller, Bradford & Risberg, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. D.L. Ex Rel. Friederichs v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Home Valu, Inc. v. Pep Boys Manny, Moe and Jack of Delaware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Kailin v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API