State v. Tart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
All of defendant’s thirteen assignments of error are directed to portions of the court’s charge.
Assignments Nos. 3 and 12 are not discussed in defendant’s brief and therefore are deemed abandoned.
Assignments Nos. 1 and 2 relate to two brief excerpts from the court’s review of the evidence offered by defendant. Assignments Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 relate to excerpts from the court’s review of the State’s contentions. Assignments Nos. 9 and 10 relate to excerpts from the court’s review of defendant’s contentions. None of the statements challenged by these assignments was called to the attention of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. LegetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.