Legal Opinion

State v. Tart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 20PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

All of defendant’s thirteen assignments of error are directed to portions of the court’s charge.

Assignments Nos. 3 and 12 are not discussed in defendant’s brief and therefore are deemed abandoned.

Assignments Nos. 1 and 2 relate to two brief excerpts from the court’s review of the evidence offered by defendant. Assignments Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 relate to excerpts from the court’s review of the State’s contentions. Assignments Nos. 9 and 10 relate to excerpts from the court’s review of defendant’s contentions. None of the statements challenged by these assignments was called to the attention of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. LegetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API