State v. Legette
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Defendants’ first assignment of error is based on the dual contention that (1) their in-court identification by the witness Braswell was tainted by pretrial photographic identification and (2) the court erred in denying defendants the opportunity to view the photographs in question. Defendants argue that the findings and conclusions to the contrary are erroneous and that their motion to suppress the in-court identification should have been allowed.
The evidence developed on voir dire tends to show that four or five hours after the robbery Deputy Sheriff Grant took about a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. PaigeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.