Legal Opinion

Hendrickson v. Harry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1917No. Docket No. 131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Houghton; O’Brien, J. Case by William Hendrickson against Absalom Harry for the alienation of his wife’s affections. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

In December, 1915, plaintiff’s wife filed her bill for a divorce in the circuit court for the county of Houghton, in chancery, and in June, 1916, a decree of divorce was entered in said cause, which recites that it satisfactorily appeared that the material facts charged in the bill were true. Among the facts charged in the bill are the following: Shortly after marriage, the husband began to drink liquors to excess, and in October, 1910, while the parties were living in Superior, Wis., and from then to July, 1911, he on divers days and times beat, struck, kicked, and choked his wife'and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. People v. MarbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Perry v. LoyejoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Derham v. DerhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cain v. EnyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. PettyMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Patterson v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Lenkiewicz v. KastnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kiesgen v. HarnessMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API