Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 68PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Mecosta; Barton (Joseph.), J. Case by Albert A. Patterson against Andrew Hill for the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action on the case for damages for the alleged alienation of the affections of the plaintiff’s wife by the defendant. The declaration which was filed on March 4, 1919, contains but one count, and alleges in substance that the plaintiff was, to wit, on the 5th day of May, 1915, in full possession of the affections, comfort, fellowship, aid and assistance of his wife, Ellen Patterson, and that the defendant wrongfully and wickedly intending to injure the plaintiff, and to alienate and destroy the affections of plaintiff’s wife for him on, to wit, the 5th day of May, 1915, and on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maynard v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hagerman v. WigentMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Thayer v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Barras v. BarrasMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Cain v. EnyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Whittet v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Kiesgen v. HarnessMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People v. GessingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API