Legal Opinion

Perry v. Loyejoy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1883PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Ingham. Case. . Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, O. J.

This is a special action on the case in which the plaintiff Perry alleges an unwarrantable and injurious interference by Lovejoy with his social and domestic rights and enjoyments. The substance of the charge is that Lovejoy tortiously enticed and procured Perry’s wife to refuse to live with him and to desert him, whereby he lost her affection and her comfort, fellowship, society and assistance. A recovery was had and defendant alleges exceptions-The plaintiff’s marriage occurred in 1870 and at the date of trial in March last they had two children, a boy of eleven and a girl…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. KimmellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Bennett v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Rossiter v. ChesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
  4. Preston v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1861
  5. White v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Bean v. McFarlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Cripe v. CripeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Nicholson v. HanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Edgell v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API