Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1905No. S.F. No. 3098PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco allowing alimony. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting ■defendant the sum of one hundred dollars per month alimony pending an appeal from an order granting a new trial, and an •additional sum for attorney’s fees and costs. No point is made as to the award of counsel fees or costs, the sole question being concerning the validity of the award of alimony.

It appears from the record that on April 20, 1899, the superior court of San Francisco, in an action brought by the defendant against the plaintiff for maintenance on the ground of desertion, made a decree in defendant’s favor, requiring plaintiff to pay one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lincoln v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API