Legal Opinion

Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc. v. Ingels

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1939No. Civ. 12159PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Plaintiff, the owner of a fleet of automobile trucks and trailers, commenced this action to restrain the Director of Motor Vehicles from canceling license plates which had been issued for its vehicles and from seizing and selling the vehicles to enforce payment of a penalty in the sum of $4,823. The trial court gave judgment refusing relief, from which plaintiff appeals.

The facts are established by stipulation of the parties and by uneontradicted evidence. The last day for the payment of the registration fees without incurring a penalty for the year 1935 was February 14th of that year. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Davidson v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People ex rel. Attorney-General v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Savings & Loan Society v. McKoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Eggleston v. PlowmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hubbard v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Unemployment Compensation v. Continental Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. General Petroleum Corp. of Cal. v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Muldrow v. Texas Frozen Foods, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Diaz v. Grill Concepts Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Magan Medical Clinic v. Cal. State Bd. of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API