Legal Opinion

Youst v. Willis and Bradford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the District Court of Payne County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Taesneí, J.:

On January 14, 1895, defendants in error, Willis and Bradford, obtained a judgment against the plaintiff in error, John Youst, in the probate court of Payne county, for the sum of $160 and costs of suit, taxed at $100. From this judgment Youst appealed to the district court of said county, and for the purpose and in the perfection of said appeal, said Youst, on January 28, 1895, made and entered into an undertaking or bond for an appeal, as required by law, and containing the conditions, stipulations and undertakings provided by the statute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States Tr. Co. of New York v. . U.S. Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Pearson v. YewdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. McVeigh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Vaughn v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Harris v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Osage County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WortenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. State Ex Rel. Roth v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API