Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Roth v. Waterfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 1933No. 24650Published

1DissentMcNEILL, J.

I dissent. This is an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county involving the Mortgage Moratorium Law, which became effective on March 7, 1933, being Senate Bill No. 76, of the Fourteenth Legislature, chapter 16, Session Laws 1933. Plaintiff filed a mandamus action subsequent to the effective date of said legislatiive enactment, to compel the court clerk to sign and issue a summons in the foreclosure of a mortgage so as to have said summons show that the answer must be filed within 20 days after the date in which the summons was returnable as provided by section 284, C. O. S. 1921,…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API