Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1937No. 26731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, X

Byron Arthur V-augbn, plaintiff in error, is executor of the last will and testament of bis father. Tbe deceased owned a farm, wbicb, after bis death, tbe executor leased to tbe plaintiff, C. E. Jones. Tbis action was filed to recover for certain work that tbe plaintiff claims he did on said farm under an agreement with the defendant. In all tbe pleadings the defendant is named “Byron Arthur Vaughn, Executor of tbe Estate of Thomas Arthur Vaughn, Deceased.’' The court instructed the jury that if they returned a verdict for the plaintiff, it must be against the defendant individually…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. West v. MadanskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Brown v. QuintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Hanson v. BlakeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Riedy v. BidwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albert Henry Kasishke, Jr., of the Estate of Olive M. Kasishke, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Phelps v. Exchange Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API