Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1994No. 92-03396; CA A79368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred in concluding that claimant was entitled to benefits for temporary total disability for the period during which he had no treating physician.

There is no dispute as to the facts. Claimant suffered a disabling lumbar strain on June 5, 1991, while working for employer. Employer initially denied the claim, but later accepted it by stipulation. The Board found that claimant was disabled from July 30, 1991, to November 1, 1991. SAIF does not challenge that finding. It contends, however, that for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Silsby v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Sandoval v. Crystal PineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. RebholzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API