Legal Opinion

Sandoval v. Crystal Pine

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. 90-01081; CA A74626PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. He argues that the Board erred when it held that employer was not required to pay temporary total disability (TTD) after November 5, 1990, and that employer was not liable for attorney fees or penalties. ORS 656.262(4)(b). We affirm.

The Board found that claimant, a tree planter, injured his back in a fall on October 19, 1989. Employer accepted the claim and began paying TTD. In October, 1990, employer requested verification of claimant’s inability to work from claimant’s attending physician. The physician responded by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Northrup King & Co. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Airlines, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. SAIF Corp. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Cameron v. Norco Contract ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Cameron v. Norco Contract ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API