Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Rebholz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 1998No. 94-10424; CA A89711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) denying claimant temporary disability benefits beyond the date he became medically stationary. Claimant contends that the Board is precluded from determining that he is not entitled to benefits after that date because, in an earlier proceeding, it concluded that employer had improperly terminated his temporary disability benefits. We conclude that the Board correctly determined that it is not precluded from determining claimant’s entitlement to temporary disability benefits and affirm.

We take the relevant, undisputed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washington County Police Officers Ass'n v. Washington CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. SAIF Corp. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API